diff --git a/Project1/project_1_maggioni_claudio.pdf b/Project1/project_1_maggioni_claudio.pdf
index bc86944..bb87295 100644
Binary files a/Project1/project_1_maggioni_claudio.pdf and b/Project1/project_1_maggioni_claudio.pdf differ
diff --git a/Project1/project_1_maggioni_claudio.tex b/Project1/project_1_maggioni_claudio.tex
index 9bf06c0..553047c 100644
--- a/Project1/project_1_maggioni_claudio.tex
+++ b/Project1/project_1_maggioni_claudio.tex
@@ -7,7 +7,6 @@
 \usepackage{fancyvrb}
 \usepackage{tikz}
 
-
 \begin{document}
 
 \setassignment
@@ -221,7 +220,12 @@ implementing the pseudocode, my implementation:
 \end{figure}
 
 The results of the matrix multiplication benchmark for the naive, blocked, and
-BLAS implementations are shown in Figure \ref{fig:bench}.
+BLAS implementations are shown in Figure \ref{fig:bench}. The blocked
+implementation achieves approximately 50\% more FLOPS than the naive
+implementation thanks to the optimisations in space and temporal cache locality
+described. However, the blocked implementation achives less than a tenth of
+FLOPS compared to Intel MKL BLAS based one due to the microarchitecture
+optimization the latter one is able to exploit.
 
 \begin{figure}[t]
     \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{timing.pdf}