mp3: other corrections

This commit is contained in:
Claudio Maggioni 2020-11-02 17:43:56 +01:00
parent 7690f4b23d
commit 09a568eaa5
5 changed files with 36 additions and 19 deletions

View file

@ -106,18 +106,18 @@ for c = 1:nc
% 3. Calculate number of cut edges
% 4. Visualize the partitioning result
fprintf('%6d %6d %10d %6d %10d %6d %10d %6d %d\n',sp8,sp16,...
m8,m16,c8,c16,i8,i16, nnz(diag(A)));
fprintf('%6d %6d %10d %6d %10d %6d %10d %6d\n',sp8,sp16,...
m8,m16,c8,c16,i8,i16);
end
%Bisection Spectral Metis 5.0.2 Coordinate Inertial
%Partitions 8 16 8 16 8 16 8 16
% -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%airfoil1.mat ... 327 578 320 563 516 819 577 897
%3elt.mat ....... 372 671 395 651 733 1168 880 1342
%barth4.mat ..... 505 758 405 689 875 1306 891 1350
% mesh3e1.mat .... 72 111 75 117 75 122 67 102
%mesh3e1.mat .... 75 124 75 117 75 122 67 102
%crack.mat ...... 804 1303 784 1290 1343 1860 1061 1618
function n = runtest(A, xy, algorithm, depth, t, show_graphs)
@ -136,7 +136,9 @@ function n = runtest(A, xy, algorithm, depth, t, show_graphs)
end
function n = recurse(A, xy, algorithm, color, depth, show_graphs)
warning('off','MATLAB:eigs:IllConditionedA')
[partA, partB] = algorithm(A, xy);
warning('on', 'MATLAB:eigs:IllConditionedA')
[n, ~] = cutsize(A, partA);
A1 = A(partA, partA);
xy1 = xy(partA, :);

View file

@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
load Toy_meshes;
addpaths_GP;
load Toy_meshes;
[W1,c1] = grid5rec(10,100);
[W2,c2] = grid5rec(100,10);

View file

@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
load Toy_meshes;
addpaths_GP;
load Toy_meshes;
[A, xy] = grid9(50);
bisection_spectral(A, xy, 2);

Binary file not shown.

View file

@ -37,6 +37,13 @@
Please note all scripts used can be found under the folder \texttt{Project\_3\_Maggioni\_Claudio/src}.
\section*{Note on collaboration}
Please note that in the spirit of collaboration I shared with some of my classmates the helper
function \texttt{drawgraph(...)} used in exercise 3 and included in the file \texttt{bisection\_spectral.m}, and the functions \texttt{runtest(...)} and \texttt{recurse(...)} in file \texttt{bench\_rec\_bisection.m} for exercise 4. I am therefore claiming here I am the sole author of these functions.
Please also note this sharing was done with Edoardo Vecchi's supervision.
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\section{Install METIS 5.0.2, and the corresponding Matlab mex interface}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
@ -78,8 +85,14 @@ Colors to represent the partitions and the eigenvector components are the same a
I summarize my results in table \ref{table:Rec_bisection}. Additionally, the graph plots
for a recursive partition in 16 parts of \textit{Crack} are avaliable in figure \ref{fig:bicrack}.
The figure shows the partitions and edge cuts with colors randomly assigned by MATLAB.
Again the data shown here can reproduced using a MATLAB script (\texttt{Bench\_rec\_bisection.m}). Please note that the given recursion helper function \texttt{rec\_bisection} was not used. Instead, the function \texttt{runtest} was implemented to allow for partitioning graphs to be generated at will.
Please note that while computing spectral partitioning for \textit{barth4} MATLAB emits a warning
in the computation of the adjacency matrix eigenvalues stating that the matrix is ill conditioned.
This warning was suppressed so as not to interfere with the table printout.
\begin{figure}[h]
\begin{subfigure}{0.5\textwidth}
\centering
@ -113,6 +126,8 @@ Again the data shown here can reproduced using a MATLAB script (\texttt{Bench\_r
I summarize my results in table \ref{table:Compare_Metis}. Additionally, plots for the $n = 32$ cases can be found in figure \ref{fig:bikmetis}. Please note that both the table and the plots can be reproduced using script \texttt{Bench\_metis.m}.
The figure shows the resulting partitions with colors randomly assigned by MATLAB. All edge cuts are colored in black.
I had the suspicion that k-way partitioning would perform better in all cases, since in this the partitioning algorithm has a chance to see the entire problem and to perform decision that could affect all partitions. Instead, for the \texttt{Crack} mesh, recursive partitioning surprisedly performed better than k-way for both $n = 16$ and $n = 32$, producing slighly smaller edge cuts.
\begin{figure}[h]
@ -156,10 +171,10 @@ I had the suspicion that k-way partitioning would perform better in all cases, s
grid5rect(100,10)& 10 & 10 & 10 & 10 \\
grid5recRotate(100,10,-45)& 18 & 10 & 10 & 10 \\
gridt(40) & 58 & 58 & 58 & 58 \\
grid9(30) & 88 & 92 & 104 & 88 \\
grid9(30) & 88 & 92 & 102 & 88 \\
Smallmesh & 25 & 13 & 12 & 30 \\
Tapir & 55 & 34 & 18 & 49 \\
Eppstein & 42 & 48 & 45 & 45 \\ \hline \hline
Eppstein & 42 & 48 & 42 & 45 \\ \hline \hline
\end{tabular}
\label{table:bisection}
\end{table}
@ -173,7 +188,7 @@ I had the suspicion that k-way partitioning would perform better in all cases, s
airfoil1 & 327 \hfill 578 & 320 \hfill 563 & 516 \hfill 819 & 577 \hfill 897\\
3elt & 372 \hfill 671 & 395 \hfill 651 & 733 \hfill 1168 & 880 \hfill 1342\\
barth4 & 505 \hfill 758 & 405 \hfill 689 & 875 \hfill 1306 & 891 \hfill 1350\\
mesh3e1 & 72\hfill111 & 75\hfill117 & 75\hfill122 & 67\hfill102\\
mesh3e1 & 75 \hfill 124 & 75 \hfill 117 & 75 \hfill 122 & 67 \hfill 102\\
crack & 804 \hfill 1303 & 784 \hfill 1290 & 1343 \hfill 1860 & 1061 \hfill 1618\\\hline\hline
\end{tabular}
\label{table:Rec_bisection}