63 lines
2.6 KiB
TeX
63 lines
2.6 KiB
TeX
\newcommand{\figureVII}[2][0.32\textwidth]{
|
|
\begin{subfigure}{#1}
|
|
\vspace{0.5cm}
|
|
\begin{minipage}[c]{\textwidth}%
|
|
\resizebox{\textwidth}{!}{\input{figures/figure_7/#2.pgf}}
|
|
\end{minipage}
|
|
\end{subfigure}}
|
|
|
|
\begin{figure}[p]
|
|
\figureVII[0.49\textwidth]{priority-2011}
|
|
\figureVII[0.49\textwidth]{tier-all}
|
|
\caption{Task event rates vs.\ task priority and task termination in 2011 and 2019 (all clusters aggregated) traces. For 2019 traces tier classes instead of raw priority values are shown: 2011's $[0,1]$ priority range corresponds to the ``Free'' tier, range $[2,8]$ corresponds to the ``Best effort batch'' tier, range $[9-10]$ corresponds to the ``Production'' tier and priority 11 corresponds to the ``Monitoring'' tier.}\label{fig:figureVII-a}
|
|
\end{figure}
|
|
|
|
\begin{figure}[p]
|
|
\figureVII{tier-a}
|
|
\figureVII{tier-b}
|
|
\figureVII{tier-c}
|
|
\figureVII{tier-d}
|
|
\figureVII{tier-e}
|
|
\figureVII{tier-f}
|
|
\figureVII{tier-g}
|
|
\figureVII{tier-h}
|
|
\caption{Task event rates vs.\ task priority tier and final task termination for each cluster in the
|
|
2019 traces.}\label{fig:figureVII-a-csts}
|
|
\end{figure}
|
|
|
|
\begin{figure}[p]
|
|
\figureVII[0.49\textwidth]{exectime-2011}
|
|
\figureVII[0.49\textwidth]{exectime-all}
|
|
\caption{Task event rates vs.\ event execution time and final task termination in 2011 and 2019 (all clusters aggregated) traces. Execution time classes are defined in minutes, with the exception of ``1d'' which means one day.}\label{fig:figureVII-b}
|
|
\end{figure}
|
|
|
|
\begin{figure}[p]
|
|
\figureVII{exectime-a}
|
|
\figureVII{exectime-b}
|
|
\figureVII{exectime-c}
|
|
\figureVII{exectime-d}
|
|
\figureVII{exectime-e}
|
|
\figureVII{exectime-f}
|
|
\figureVII{exectime-g}
|
|
\figureVII{exectime-h}
|
|
\caption{Task event rates vs.\ event execution time and final task termination for each cluster in the 2019 traces. Refer to figure~\ref{fig:figureVII-b} for interpretation of the execution time classes.}\label{fig:figureVII-b-csts}
|
|
\end{figure}
|
|
|
|
\begin{figure}[p]
|
|
\figureVII[0.49\textwidth]{nexec-2011}
|
|
\figureVII[0.49\textwidth]{nexec-all}
|
|
\caption{Task event rates vs.\ machine concurrency and final task termination in 2011 and 2019 (all clusters aggregated) traces. Machine concurrency is defined as the number of co-executed tasks on the machine where the analyzed task is executing.}\label{fig:figureVII-c}
|
|
\end{figure}
|
|
|
|
\begin{figure}[p]
|
|
\figureVII{nexec-a}
|
|
\figureVII{nexec-b}
|
|
\figureVII{nexec-c}
|
|
\figureVII{nexec-d}
|
|
\figureVII{nexec-e}
|
|
\figureVII{nexec-f}
|
|
\figureVII{nexec-g}
|
|
\figureVII{nexec-h}
|
|
\caption{Task event rates vs.\ machine concurrency and final task termination in each 2019 cluster. Refer to figure~\ref{fig:figureVII-c} for the definition of ``machine concurrency''.}\label{fig:figureVII-c-csts}
|
|
\end{figure}
|
|
|